Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -OceanicInvest
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-15 06:18:24
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (292)
Related
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- How Quvenzhané Wallis Spent Her Break From Hollywood Being Normal
- Los Angeles 'Domestead' listed for $2.3M with 'whimsical' gardens: Take a look inside
- Jury finds Wisconsin man guilty in killing, sexual assault of 20-month-old girl
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Tornadoes kill 2 in Oklahoma as governor issues state of emergency for 12 counties amid storm damage
- Eminem teases new album, ‘The Death of Slim Shady'
- College protesters vow to keep demonstrations as schools shut down encampments amid reports of antisemitism
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Ellen DeGeneres breaks silence on talk show's 'devastating' end 2 years ago: Reports
Ranking
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- How Quvenzhané Wallis Spent Her Break From Hollywood Being Normal
- 'Challengers': Josh O'Connor, Mike Faist talk phallic churros and 'magical' love triangle
- Tornadoes kill 2 in Oklahoma as governor issues state of emergency for 12 counties amid storm damage
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Los Angeles 'Domestead' listed for $2.3M with 'whimsical' gardens: Take a look inside
- Which cicada broods are coming in 2024? Why the arrival of Broods XIII and XIX is such a rarity
- Senators renew scrutiny of border officers' authority to search Americans' phones
Recommendation
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
In Beijing, Blinken and Xi stress need for continued U.S.-China dialogue to avoid any miscommunications
Mr. Irrelevant list: Who will join Brock Purdy as last pick in NFL draft?
We're not the sex police: Here's what intimacy coordinators actually do on film and TV sets
'We're reborn!' Gazans express joy at returning home to north
Banana Republic Factory’s Spring Sale Is Here With up to 70% off Colorful Spring Staples & More
Infamous Chicago 'rat-hole' landmark removed due to 'damages,' reports say
2024 American Music Awards to air on CBS